Face-to-face or online? Factors modulating the choice of classroom modality in university students.

Authors

  • Florencia Carolina Basso Facultad de Ciencias Humanas y de la Conducta. Universidad Favaloro. Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • Ángel Elgier Universidad de Buenos Aires. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET). Argentina. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6110-5151
  • Lucas G. Gago Galvagno Universidad Abierta Interamericana. Facultad de Psicología y Relaciones Humanas. Laboratorio de Cognición y Políticas Públicas (CogPub). Instituto de Investigaciones en Psicología. Facultad de Psicología - Universidad de Buenos Aires. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET). Argentina. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5993-3866

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59471/debate202344

Keywords:

personalidad, virtualidad, pandemia, estudiantes universitarios, presencialidad

Abstract

At the beginning of 2020, the WHO declared a pandemic situation due to the COVID-19. One of the most affected areas was the educational field. With this in mind, a new course delivery had to be implemented, online. After a year or more of the introduction of this new way of learning, this investigation explored the personality factor and what other factors influenced in the choice of instructional delivery of college students’ nowadays, online, face-to-face or blended learning. 314 students’ replied to an online survey through the Google Forms platform and composed of a sociodemographic questionnaire and the AEP. The results obtained didn’t show the existence of an association between the instructional delivery and the 5 factors of personality. Otherwise the age, the working hours and the need of face-to-face practice were the variables with the strongest association with the instructional delivery. This shows that the variability between the course delivery is more related to the sociodemographic variables than to personality.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Abedini, Y. (2020). “Students’ creativity in virtual vs. Classroom courses on the basis of their personality traits: A prediction study”. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 18(6), 525–536. Disponible en web: https://doi.org/10.34190/JEL.18.6.005

Ahmady, S., Shahbazi, S., & Heidari, M. (2020). “Transition to Virtual Learning During the Coronavirus Disease–2019 Crisis in Iran: Opportunity Or Challenge?” Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness, 14(3), e11–e12. Disponible en web: https://doi. org/10.1017/dmp.2020.142

Besser, A., Flett, G. L., & Zeigler-Hill, V. (2020). “Adaptability to a sudden transition to online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: Understanding the challenges for students”.

Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology. Disponible en web: https://doi. org/10.1037/stl0000198

Calvo, S. T., Cervi, L., Tusa, F., & Parola, A. (2020). “Educación en tiempos de pandemia: reflexiones de alumnos y profesores sobre la enseñanza virtual universitaria en España, Italia y Ecuador”. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 78, 1–21. Disponible en web: DOI: 10.4185/RLCS-2020-1466.

Chesser, S., Murrah, W., & Forbes, S. A. (2020). “Impact of Personality on Choice of Instructional Delivery and Students’ Performance”. American Journal of Distance Education, 34(3), 211–223. Disponible en web: https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2019.1705116

Costa Jr, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). “Four ways five factors are basic”. Personality and Individual Differences, 13(6), 653–665. Disponible en web: https://doi. org/10.1016/0191-8869(92)90236-I.

d’Orville, H. (2020). “COVID-19 causes unprecedented educational disruption: Is there a road towards a new normal?” Prospects, 49(1–2), 11–15. Disponible en web: https://doi. org/10.1007/s11125-020-09475-0

Dung, D. (2020). “The advantages and disadvantages of virtual schools”. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSR-JRME), 10(3), 45–48. Disponible en web: https:// doi.org/10.9790/7388-1003054548

Expósito, C. D., & Marsollier, R. G. (2020). “Virtualidad y educación en tiempos de COVID-19. Un estudio empírico en Argentina”. Educación y Humanismo, 22(39), 1–22. Disponible en web: https://doi.org/10.17081/eduhum.22.39.4214

Gonzalez-Ramirez, J., Mulqueen, K., Zealand, R., Silverstein, S., Mulqueen, C., & BuShell, S. (2021). “Emergency Online Learning: College Students’ Perceptions During the COVID-19 Pandemic”. College Student Journal, 55(1), 29–46.

Hernández Sampieri, R., Fernández Collado, C., & Baptista Lucio, M. del P. (2014). Metodología de la Investigación (Interamericana Editores (ed.); 6ta Edició). McGraw-Hill Education.

Ledesma, R. D., Sánchez, R., & Díaz-Lázaro, C. M. (2011). “Adjective checklist to assess the big five personality factors in the Argentine population”. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93(1), 46–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2010.513708

OMS. (2020). “Covid-19: Cronología de la actuación de la OMS”. In Organización Mundial de la Salud. Disponible en web: https://www.who.int/es/news/ item/27-04-2020-who-timeline---covid-19

Paulsen, J., & McCormick, A. C. (2020). “Reassessing Disparities in Online Learner Student Engagement in Higher Education”. In Educational Researcher (Vol. 49, Issue 1, pp. 20– 29). Disponible en web: https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X19898690

Resolución 104/2020. (2020). Ley simple: COVID-19 - Universidades. Disponible en web: https://www.argentina.gob.ar/justicia/derechofacil/leysimple/ emergencia-sanitaria-covid-19-universidades#titulo-1

Saleh, A., & Bista, K. (2017). “Examining Factors Impacting Online Survey Response Rates in Educational Research: Perceptions of Graduate Students”. Online Submission, 13(29), 63–74.

Smith, W. G. (2008). “Does gender influence online survey participation? A record-linkage analysis of university faculty online survey response behavior”. Eric Ed501717, 501717, 1–21. Disponible en web: http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED501717.pdf

Published

2023-08-21

How to Cite

Basso, F. C., Elgier, Ángel, & Gago Galvagno, L. G. (2023). Face-to-face or online? Factors modulating the choice of classroom modality in university students. Debate Universitario, 13(22), 25–38. https://doi.org/10.59471/debate202344